(11) Kepler's First Law of Planetary Motion
The laws of orbital motion are mathematical, and one cannot explore them without some mathematics. The math used here is rather elementary; if you need a refresher click here. Otherwise, you can just skip the equations and follow the narrative.
The Mathematical Description of a Curve
As already noted, the cartesian system labels any point in a plane (e. g. on a flat sheet of paper) by a pair of numbers (x,y), its distance from two perpendicular axes. These numbers are known as the "coordinates" of the point.
A line in the plane--straight or curved--contains many points, each with its own (x,y) coordinates. Often there exists a formula ("equation") which connects x and y: for instance, straight lines have a relationship
y = ax + b
where any pair of numbers (a,b), positive, negative or zero, gives some straight line. More complicated relationships give curves: for instance
y = ax2
gives a parabola, with a any number. Usually (though not always) y is isolated, so that the formula has the form
y = y(x)
where y(x) stands for "any expression involving x" or in mathematical terms, a "function of x." The curves drawn here are the straight line y = -(2/3)x + 2 and the parabola y = x2. A list of some of their points follows.
As already noted, other ways exist for labeling points in the plane. For instance, a point may be labeled by its distance r from a central point O ("origin") and the angle f (or Greek f) which the line OP makes with some standard direction. Such "polar coordinates" (drawing on the left, below) are the ones best suited for describing planetary motion.
Again, if all the values of (r,f) of a curve are related by some equation which can be symbolically written
r = r(f)
then the function r(f) is said to be the equation of the line, in polar coordinates. The simplest function is a constant number a, giving the line
r = a
The value of r equals a for any value of f. That gives a circle around the origin, its radius equal to a, shown in the drawing on the right above.
Consider next the curve whose equation is
r = a(1- e2)/ (1+ e cos f)
where the eccentricity e is a number between 0 and 1. If e = 0, this is clearly the circle encountered earlier.
How about other values? The function cos f represents a wave-like behavior (picture below), and as f goes through a full circle, it goes down, from +1 to 0, then -1, then up again to 0 and +1. The denominator also rises and falls as a wave, and it is smallest when cos f = -1 . Here is the table of the main values (360 is in parentheses, because it represents the same direction as 0 degrees):
|1 + cos f||1 + e||1||1 - e||1||1 + e|
As long as e is less than 1, the denominator is always positive. It is never zero, so that for any f one can name, one can always find a suitable r. In other words, the curve goes completely around the origin, it is closed.
The expression (1 - e2) can be factored--that is, written as two expressions multiplied by each other ("the product of two expressions"). As discussed in the section on algebraic identities
1 - e2= (1 - e)(1 + e)
At some of the points on the above table, one of the expressions cancels the denominator, giving:
|r||a(1 - e)||a(1 - e2)||a(1 + e)||a(1 - e2)||a(1 - e)|
The distance of the line from the origin thus fluctuates between a(1 - e) and a(1 + e), and the result is a flattened circle or ellipse; the point O (the origin) is its focus. All planetary orbits resemble ellipses, each with its own value of e or eccentricity: the smaller e is, the closer the shape to a circle. The Earth's orbit is very close to a circle, with e = 0.0068, and other major planets (except for Pluto) have comparable eccentricities: if you saw a scale drawing of that orbit on a sheet of paper, your eye would not be able to tell it apart from a circle. The orbit of Comet Halley, on the other hand, has e quite close to 1.
The ellipse has many interesting properties. It is a symmetrical figure and a second focus O' can also be drawn. Furthermore, it can also be defined (the original definition, in fact) as the collection of points for which the sum R1+R2 of their distances from two fixed points is always the same, and those points are the foci (Latin plural) O and O'.
The longest dimension of the ellipse, its width AB along the line connecting the two foci, is its "major axis." Suppose (R1,R2) are the distances of A from the foci O and O'. Then R1 = OA = a(1 - e) is the smallest distance of the ellipse from O, R2 = O'A = OB (by symmetry) is the largest and therefore equals a(1 + e). But, OA + OB = AB, hence
AB = a(1 - e) + a(1 + e) = 2a
Hence the quantity a in the equation of the ellipse is known as semi-major axis. We can now state Kepler's law more precisely as "the square of the orbital period T is proportional to the cube of the semi-major axis of its orbit around the Sun."
The two quantities (a,e) completely define the ellipse. When that ellipse is the orbit of a planet or a satellite, they form two of the six orbital elements which define the state of the orbiting body. A third element, the mean anomaly, specifies the position of the planet or satellite along the orbit, and the remaining three define the orientation of the orbit in 3-dimensional space. More about the orbital elements can be found in section (12a)
Refining the First Law
Kepler's first law was:
"The orbit of a planet is an ellipse, with the Sun at one focus"
Actually, this is not 100% accurate. Imagine the planet magically getting heavier and heavier, while the Sun is getting lighter and lighter. At some point both of them would be equally heavy: could we then say which is orbiting around which?
To be fully accurate, the first law should have placed the focus of the orbital ellipse at the center of gravity of the planet-Sun system. (The center of gravity will be defined later, but intuitively, if the masses are very unequal, as with a planet and the Sun, it lies close to the center of the heavier object.) Because the Sun is so much heavier than the Mars, the effect on the orbit of Mars (which Kepler studied) was too small to be noted by him. Nevertheless, the Sun also moves in response to motions of its planets, and motions of this type have become an important tool in the search for planets outside the solar system.
An Earth-sized planet orbiting a distant star would be far too dim to be seen with any earthly telescope, especially against the glare of its sun, the star itself. However, as the planet goes around the orbit, its star also moves in a mirror image orbit around the common center of gravity. It is a much smaller orbit and a much slower motion, because the center of gravity is very close to the center of that star (in the Earth-Sun system, it is inside the Sun), but it can still be detected by subtle variations of the starlight. Recently a few such planets have been found, but most are Jupiter-sized and none seems suitable for life. The search, however, goes on.
Bodies in the solar system can also move in other conic sections, in parabolas or hyperbolas, whose equations resemble that of an ellipse, but have e equal to 1 or larger. Such bodies are not bound to the Sun, but are free to escape it. The denominator in the equation of the trajectory
r = a(1 - e2)/ (1 + e cos f)
then becomes zero for some values of f, making r infinite, and as the moving body approaches those values, that body moves further and further away, with no limit. Comets in general have and eccentricity e close to 1, suggesting they have come from the very distant fringes of the solar system. The space probe Voyager 2 has e > 1 and is on its way out of the solar system, never to return.
Next Stop: #12 Kepler's Second Law
Author and curator: David P. Stern, email@example.com