Pc 1-2 and IPDP pulsations
spaceweb@oulu.fi - last update: 13 November 1998, 1440 UT (RR)
Introduction
Continuous geomagnetic ULF waves with
period of 0.2 - 10 s are called Pc 1-2 pulsations
(a special subclass has been termed IPDP).
Pulsations at these frequencies are generated by
the electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC)
instability near the magnetic equator, and they are
thus called ion cyclotron waves. There are three
observational facts supporting the EMIC nature
of the waves:
- electromagnetic nature of the waves
- predominance of left-hand polarization
near the equator
- existense of a gap in spectral power in the vicinity of the helium gyrofrequency, F(He+)
Ground based observations of structured Pc 1 pulsations.
Pc 1-2 waves propagate towards the ionosphere along the field line, and can be observed also on the
ground, as reported already by Sucksdorff (1936) and Harang (1936). Two main subgroups
have been identified on basis of ground observations: structured pulsations (also known
as periodic or pearl pulsations) and unstructured pulsations (Fukunishi et al., 1981).
Energy for the EMIC wave generation is provided by temperature anisotropies (Tperp > Tpar) of
magnetospheric protons in the energy range 10 - 100 keV. For example, solar wind compressions of the
magnetosphere favour Pc 1 generation, as the compressions increase the ion anisotropy which, in turn,
increase the wave growth rate (Olson and Lee, 1983; Kangas et al., 1986). The necessary ions can be
either of ring current (mid- and low-latitude events) or plasma sheet (high-latitude events) origin.
Occurrence distribution
The effective amplification of EMIC waves depends on the amount of time spent propagating through a
finite growth region (Kozyra et al., 1984), and the convective growth rate is thus inversely related to the
group velocity of the waves. Since the group velocity is related to the Alfvén velocity Va, enhanced cold
plasma densities and low magnetic field strengths (= low Va) favour the wave growth. Since the magnetic
field lines have minimums at the equator, the wave growth occurs there. A minimum in Va occurs
typically just inside the plasmapause (maximum at the plasmapause; e.g., Fraser et al., 1992) and,
accordingly, two types of Pc 1-2 pulsations are related to this region close to the ring current: the
so-called structured or pearl Pc 1 pulsations (see, e.g., Erlandson et al., 1992) and the IPDP events.
The ring current ion source depends strongly on geomagnetic activity, and the pearl events occur
typically during a recovery phase of a geomagnetic storm, while the IPDPs occur during the active phase
of a substorm. The structured pulsations are most often seen
in the morning sector (Saito, 1969).
However, the plasmapause is not the most important region for EMIC wave growth. Observations from
both magnetosphere (Anderson et al., 1992a) and ground (Plyasova-Bakounina et al., 1996) show
maximum Pc 1-2 occurrence probability at L=7-9, ML=12-15, indicating that the plasma sheet ions
are the most important energy source for the waves. A weaker maximum is found in the dawn sector
(03-09 MLT). These high latitude pulsations are unstructured (e.g., hydromagnetic chorus type), and
storm independent. However, the emissions may be modulated by Pc 4-5 pulsations (e.g.,
Plyasova-Bakounina et al., 1996).
Finally, some very high latitude (ground based) events observed in the dawn sector have been explained
by ions injected in the cusp/cleft region, and drifting westward towards dawn (Hansen et al., 1992).
However, it is possible that these are solar wind controlled pulsations leaking into the magnetosphere
through the cusp (Plyasova-Bakounina et al., 1996), or waves related to
plasma mantle (Dyrud et al., 1997).
Satellite observations have shown that the latitudinal extent of Pc 1 wave events are of the order of 100
km when projected into the ionosphere (Iyemori and Hayashi, 1989; Erlandson et al., 1990; Erlandson
and Anderson, 1996). Individual bursts have even smaller extent. The events are much more extended
longitudinally, as the ions providing the energy drift around the Earth.
Structured (pearl) pulsations
The pearl pulsations appear as repetitive bursts of Pc 1 waves, formed by wave packets propagating
along magnetic field lines between conjugate points and partially reflecting from the ionosphere.
Accordingly, it has been shown that the bursts are in antiphase in the northern and southern hemispheres.
The figure here shows a Pc 1 pearl (electric field component) as observed in the
ionosphere by the Freja satellite (Mursula et al., 1994). For the wave growth to occur, the reflected wave's k-vector
should be parallel to B, and this is possible only in the presence of a density gradient. Such a gradient
occurs at the plasmapause and, indeed, all structured events have been found to occur just inside or near
the plasmapause.
Note, however, that the validity of the wave packet theory has lately been questioned (e.g., Mursula et al., 1997).
The pearl events exhibit a positive frequency-time dispersion which is of the order of 50 s/Hz. The dispersion is
most likely formed already in the magnetospheric source region, as suggested by the theoretical work by
Gendrin et al. (1971), and by the satellite observations from Freja (Mursula et al., 1994) and Viking
(Erlandson et al., 1996).
It has been suggested that the EMIC emissions can be structured also without the density gradient simply
via modulation by lower frequncy waves (Pc 4-5 range; see, e.g., Plyasova-Bakounina et al., 1996;
Rasinkangas and Mursula, 1998).
This may be an important factor at least in the outer magnetosphere.
In addition, the possibility that ionospheric Alfvén resonator may be
able to create pearl structures has been suggested.
Wave properties
The EMIC waves grow typically at frequencies 0.1 to 0.5 times the equatorial proton gyrofrequncy,
F(H+). In the first approximation, the most significant amplification of EMIC waves should occur below
the equatorial helium gyrofrequency, F(He+) = 0.25×F(H+). Since gyrofrequncies depend on magnetic
field strength (qB/m), one would expect decreasing wave frequencies at higher latitudes. This is also
often observed. However, the Viking observations (Erlandson et al., 1990) have shown that while at
lower invariant latitudes (59°-72°) EMIC waves do occur at f < F(He+), at higher invariant latitudes
(70°-77°) they are seen above this frequency (note that no waves can grow close to F(He+)). This fact
was explained by the linear wave growth rate dependence on the heavy ion energy and anisotropy, and
partly also by wave propagation characteristics (ray tracing studies have shown that waves below
F(He+) are well guided, while those above are not). It is actually the latter type of waves that are more
typical.
To investigate further the frequency properties, we introduce a normalized frequency X = F/F(H+),
where F is the local, observed wave frequency, and F(H+) is the equatorial proton gyrofrequency along
the same field line. This value is always < 1 and, for waves F < F(He+), X < 0.25. Waves with X < 0.25
and 0.25 < X < 0.45 are typically seen at the early afternoon occurrence maxima, while waves with
higher X are seen within the dawn sector (03-09 MLT) secondary peak. Even more striking difference
concerns the polarization characteristics of these populations: the dawnside events seem to be
generated with polarizations ranging from purely left-hand to linear, while the afternoon side events are of
the typical left-hand type (Anderson et al., 1992b). It is not possible to explain this feature in terms of
crossover from left- to right-hand polarization occurring typically during propagation from low to high
magnetic field strengths (towards ionosphere).
Ionospheric effects
Comparison of the Pc 1 waves observed in space and on ground is not always straightforward, since the
field line guidance of Pc 1 waves stops in the ionosphere, and ground-based observations are influenced
by ducting of waves in the ionospheric waveguide
(e.g., Fujita, 1987).
The ducting has an interesting side-effect, called multiband Pc 1 events, where
observed on the ground sees emissions at two or more frequency range simultaneously.
They are formed as emissions from different source regions (L-shells) are ducted within the
ionosphere to a point on the ground.
Note that this is different than having band-like structure because of the
splitting of the emission spectra by magnetospheric heavy ions (He+ and O+).
Furthermore, there are some evidence of rare occurrence of multiband structured pulsations
produced solely within one source (Feygin et al., 1994).
IPDP pulsations
IPDP (intervals of pulsations of diminishing periods) tend to occur during the active phase of
geomagnetic substorms in the afternoon-evening sector
(Hayakawa et al., 1992).
References
- Anderson, B. J., R. E. Erlandson, and L. J. Zanetti, A statistical study of Pc 1-2 magnetic
pulsations in the equatorial magnetosphere 1. Equatorial occurrence distribution, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 3075-3088, 1992a.
- Anderson, B. J., R. E. Erlandson, and L. J. Zanetti, A statistical study of Pc 1-2 magnetic
pulsations in the equatorial magnetosphere 2. Wave properties, J. Geophys. Res., 97,
3089-3101, 1992b.
- Dyrud, L. P., M. J. Engebretson, J. L. Posch, W. J. Hughes, H. Fukunishi,
R. L. Arnoldy, P. T. Newell, and R. B. Horne, Ground observations and possible
source regions of two types of Pc 1-2 micropulsations at very high latitudes,
J. Geophys. Res., 102, 27011-27027, 1997.
- Engebretson, M. J., L. J. Zanetti, T. A. Potemra, D. M. Klumpar, R. J. Strangeway, and M. H. Acuna,
Observations of intense ULF pulsation activity near the geomagnetic equator during quiet times,
J. Geophys. Res., 93, 12795-12816, 1988.
- Erlandson, R. E., L. J. Zanetti, T. A. Potemra, L. P. Block, and G. Holmgren, Viking magnetic
and electric field observations of Pc 1 waves at high latitudes, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 5941-5955,
1990.
- Erlandson, R. E., B. J. Anderson, and L. J. Zanetti, Viking magnetic and electric field
observations of periodic Pc 1 waves: Pearl pulsations, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 14823-, 1992.
- Erlandson, R. E. and B. J. Anderson, Pc 1 waves in the ionosphere: A statistical study, J.
Geophys. Res., 101, 7843-, 1996.
- Erlandson, R. E., K. Mursula, and T. Bösinger, Simultaneous ground-satellite observations of
structured Pc 1 pulsations, submitted to J. Geophys. Res., 1996.
- Feygin, F. Z., A. K. Nekrasov, K. Mursula, J. Kangas, and T. Pikkarainen, Coherent
multiple Pc1 pulsations bands: possible evidence for the ionospheric Alvén
resonator, Ann. Geophysicae, 12, 147-151, 1994.
- Fraser, B. J., J. C. Samson, Y. D. Hu, R. L. McPherron, and C. T. Russell, Electromagnetic ion
cyclotron waves observed near the oxygen cyclotron frequency by ISEE 1 and 2, J. Geophys.
Res., 97, 3063-3074, 1992.
- Fujita, S., Duct propagation of short-period hydromagnetic wave based on
the international reference ionospheric model, Planet. Space Sci., 35, 91-103, 1987.
- Fukunishi, H., T. Toya, K. Koike, M. Kuwashima, and M. Kawamura, Classification of
hydromagnetic emissions based on frequency-time spectra, J. Geophys. Res., 86,
9029-9039, 1981.
- Gendrin, R., S. Lacourly, A. Roux, J. Solomon, F. Z. Feigin, M. V. Gokhberg, V. A. Troitskaya,
and V. L. Yakimenko, Wave packet propagation in an amplifying medium and its application to
the dispersion characteristics and to the generation mechanisms of Pc 1 events, Planet. Space
Sci., 19, 165-194, 1971.
- Hansen H. J., B. J. Fraser, F. W. Menk, Y. Hu, P. T. Newell, C. I. Meng, and R. J. Morris,
High-latitude Pc 1 bursts arising in the dayside boundary layer region, J. Geophys. Res., 97,
3993-, 1992.
- Harang, L., Oscillations and vibrations in magnetic records at high-latitude stations, Terr. Magn.
and Atm. Electr. (former JGR), 41, 329-, 1936.
- Hayakawa, M., S. Shimakura, T. Kobayashi, and N. Sato, A study of
polarization of irregular pulsations of diminishing period and their
generation mechanism, Planet. Space Sci., 40,
1081-1091, 1992.
- Iyemori, T. and K. Hayashi, Pc 1 micropulsations observed by MAGSAT in the ionospheric F
region, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 93-, 1989.
- Kangas, J., A. Aikio, and J. V. Olson, Multistation correlation of ULF pulsations spectra
associated with sudden impulses, Planet. Space Sci., 34, 543-, 1986.
- Kozyra, J. U., T. E. Cravens, A. F. Nagy, and E. G. Fontheim, Effects of energetic heavy ions on
electromagnetic ion cyclotron wave generation in the plasmapause region, J. Geophys. Res., 89,
2217-2233, 1984.
- Mazur, V. A., and A. S. Potapov, The evolution of pearls in the Earth's
magnetosphere, Planet. Space Sci., 31,
859-863, 1983.
- Mursula, K., L. G. Blomberg, P.-A. Lindqvist, G. T. Marklund, T. Bräysy, R. Rasinkangas, and
P. Tanskanen, Dispersive Pc1 bursts observed by Freja, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1851-1854,
1994.
- Mursula, K., R. Rasinkangas, T. Bösinger, R. E. Erlandson, and P.-A. Lindqvist,
Nonbouncing Pc 1 wave bursts, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17611-17624, 1997.
- Olson, J. V. and L. C. Lee, Pc 1 wave generation by sudden impulses, Planet. Space Sci., 31,
295-, 1983.
- Plyasova-Bakounina, T. A., J. Kangas, K. Mursula, O. A. Molchanov, and A. W. Green, Pc 1-2
and Pc 4-5 pulsations observed at a network of high-latitude stations, J. Geophys. Res., 101,
10965-10973, 1996.
- Rasinkangas, R. and K. Mursula, Modulation of magnetospheric EMIC waves by Pc 3 pulsations of
upstream origin, Geopbys. Res. Lett., 25, 869-872, 1998.
- Saito, T., Geomagnetic pulsations, Space Sci. Rev., 10, 319-412, 1969.
- Sucksdorff, E., Occurrence of rapid micropulsations at Sodankylä during 1932 to 1935, Terr.
Magn. and Atm. Electr. (former JGR), 41, 337-, 1936.
- Thorne, R. M., and R. B. Horne, The contribution of ion-cyclotron waves to electron
heating and SAR-arc excitation near the storm-time plasmapause,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 417-420, 1992.
- Troitskaya, V. A., and A. V. Guglielmi, Geomagnetic micropulsations and diagnostics of the
magnetosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 7, 689-768, 1967.
See also: